No, it’s NOT, but its CEO is a bully.
Come Later for Full Article on the topic.
Reviews: ChainWire Edition
-
Why ChainWire.Org CEO is Wrong for Asking Competitors About Copyrights?
The actions of ChainWire.org’s CEO, Mr. Nadav, have raised serious questions regarding fairness, business ethics, and competition. Recently, he made claims that he holds exclusive rights to operate using the domain name “ChainWire” and, consequently, has the right to demand that competitors shut down if they use a similar name or keyword. This claim, however, is fundamentally flawed and goes against the very principles of fair competition.
The Reality of Domain Names and Copyrights
Mr. Nadav seems to believe that owning the domain name “ChainWire” gives him some kind of monopoly over the entire crypto press release market. However, this is far from true. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of domain names available for purchase across domain registrants. Anyone with the necessary resources can buy a domain, set up a website, and start a business in the same space—whether it’s PR, crypto services, or any other industry.
The concept of copyright is meant to protect original creative works, not business names or domain names. Unless a business has a registered trademark that proves it has exclusive rights to a certain name or term, anyone can use a similar name for their business, provided they are not infringing upon an existing trademark.
Interestingly, as per my research, “ChainWire” is not copyrighted yet. So, when Mr. Nadav tries to claim exclusive rights over the word in domain names and demands competitors shut down, he is not just mistaken—he is potentially trying to defraud others.
Clearly speaking, unless he holds a trademark for “ChainWire” (which he doesn’t), he has no right to claim ownership over this word or its use by others. Not sure what the legal consequences of this might be, but what’s clear is that he is behaving recklessly and failing miserably at understanding the market. He’s trying to be clever, but he’s failing.
Furthermore, according to the official domain registration information, ChainWire has not been registered for the term or domain name in the United States or Israel. In the U.S., there is no official registration for “ChainWire” as a trademark or domain name.
This is further proof that Mr. Nadav’s claim of having exclusive rights is baseless. I have attached screenshots confirming this lack of registration.
Screenshot 1: U.S. Copyright Public Records System (CPRS)
Screenshot 2: U.S. Publicrecords Copyright Status
Additionally, even in Israel, where ChainWire.org is based, the term “ChainWire” has not been registered. You can verify this for yourself by checking the relevant databaseson Israel Patents Portal.
Nothing all there in the name of ChainWire.org or it’s parent company.
See, Simply owning a domain name does not grant any individual or company the right to silence competitors. In fact, business competition is healthy and fundamental to a free market.
It’s about offering better services, innovating, and finding unique ways to stand out. Mr. Nadav’s attempt to control the market by claiming exclusive rights over a domain name and trying to force competitors out based on that claim is a serious overreach.
The Same Motive Behind Freezing Funds
This distorted view of ownership and competition is not only limited to domain names. It’s also the same flawed reasoning behind ChainWire.org’s decision to freeze my funds.
After I ran a PR campaign for one of client, our website—owned by my previous employer—was getting noticed in the crypto PR space.
The CEO of ChainWire.org apparently saw this as a threat, even though there was no real competition at play. Still, Mr. Nadav decided to freeze my funds without proper explanation.
He has now openly cleared the motive behind freezing the funds was his own personal interest and using the same misguided logic of “exclusive rights” over a domain name.
This behavior reflects a deeper issue of insecurity and a lack of understanding of healthy competition. Rather than working to grow ChainWire.org through innovation or improved services, Mr. Nadav is using tactics that undermine the basic principles of business ethics.
What Mr. Nadav Fails to Understand
The real issue here is that Mr. Nadav is mistaking control for competition. He seems to believe that owning a domain name equates to owning the entire industry.
However, it is the customers, users, and the overall market that determine success—not one individual’s claim over a domain name.
What ChainWire.org needs is a focus on growth, quality service, and fair competition. Healthy competition drives innovation, and businesses that thrive do so by offering superior value, not by stifling others who are simply trying to carve out their space in the market.
Conclusion: The Flawed Logic of ChainWire’s CEO
Mr. Nadav’s actions reflect a deeper misunderstanding of business ethics and competition. Instead of focusing on building and improving his company, he is expending energy on trying to suppress others in the industry.
Owning a domain name does not provide the right to claim ownership of a market or to freeze funds based on perceived threats.
The free market is built on competition, and as long as no one is violating copyrights or trademarks, every business has the right to enter the market, offer services, and compete fairly.
By trying to control the market in this way, Mr. Nadav is not only damaging his own reputation but also potentially undermining the entire ethos of the industry.
The focus should be on growth, improvement, and respecting the rights of others in the market. Only then will businesses like ChainWire.Org truly thrive and remain relevant in the long term.
Maybe I’m wrong for some people but let’s discuss and write in comment box with the fact and prove me wrong.
~Written By Noah Carter based on personal experience.
Reach me:
Telegram: @noahao
Email: noah@chainwire.online -
My Experience as a ChainWire.Org Reseller: What Went Wrong?
Everything was smooth sailing when I first joined ChainWire.org. I signed up, got onboarded, and was added to a dedicated group of professionals led by the CEO himself.
The promise of saving funds while executing campaigns seamlessly made me excited. I was ready to dive in. The platform supported everything I needed, from easy campaign setups to prompt support, and I felt I was in good hands.
The deal with ChainWire.org became personal for me, as I used my own funds to run the campaign, believing in their system and its potential.
For a while, everything seemed perfect.
But things started to take a strange turn when I noticed that one of my old employer’s websites was growing and was noticed by the team/CEO of ChainWire.org. It wasn’t intentional, but my employer’s campaign was starting to make some noise in the industry-related keyword space, and this, apparently, started threatening ChainWire’s position (though it wasn’t in reality).
I didn’t expect any drama. After all, business is business, right?
But then, the CEO of ChainWire.org contacted me through the group, stating that he felt the website posed a competitive threat. He went as far as informing my domain name provider and hosting provider about his concerns, which led to another stressful fortnight to save the domain name and business.
Now, let’s pause for a moment.
Imagine this scenario in any other industry.
For example, take XYZNewsWire.com, a well-known company, growing rapidly, that starts sending threatening messages to its competitors like NewsWire.com, PRNewsWire.com, PRWire, or even GlobeNewsWire.com, claiming they are using the keyword “PRWire” and demanding they shut down their operations and hand over their assets.
Does that sound logical?
No. In fact, anyone would likely laugh and think, “What a stupid move by XYZNewsWire.com CEO.”
Instead of focusing on building his own company’s growth, the CEO is out here trying to stifle the competition. He’s already a loser even before the real match begins.
The reality I faced with ChainWire.org was unfortunately no different. The reaction felt illogical and petty. Instead of embracing healthy competition, the response was one of defensiveness and undermining.
This situation not only highlighted the flaws in ChainWire.org’s handling of competition but also reflected a deeper issue in their approach to business.
The CEO Doesn’t Want Competition—But That’s Not Anyone Else’s Problem
Every individual and business has the right to enter a competitive market and run their operations freely, as long as they do not violate copyrights. This is a fundamental principle of fair competition.Holding copyrights doesn’t give anyone the right to exploit or attack resellers or small competitors in the space. The focus should always be on growing one’s own business, not on trying to sabotage others.
Unfortunately, the CEO of ChainWire.org chose to focus on stifling competition rather than growing the company. Rather than investing in improvements or finding ways to outshine competitors, his focus was on attacking others. It’s incredibly shortsighted and reeks of insecurity.
Everyone has a reputation, and when it is damaged by a bullheaded person, it can be difficult to recover. My $2197 may seem small to some, but the power of my reviews and posts will leave a lasting impact, no matter how much they try to bury them.
These posts will live on forever on forums, portals, and search engines, tracking your record across platforms.
The damage caused by this CEO’s actions isn’t just temporary; it’s permanent.
The Long-Term Consequences of Damaging Reputations
The actions taken by ChainWire.org’s CEO are not just damaging in the short term, but they also represent a long-term risk. You never know which content piece could resonate with a client or decision-maker, and once a reputation is harmed, it’s incredibly difficult to repair.I am not alone in feeling the frustration; others in the industry will be watching closely. The records will be there, preserved for everyone to see.
Instead of focusing on these petty tactics, the Chainwire.org’s CEO should focus on healthy competition, improvement, and growth.
The future isn’t built on fear and suppression; it’s built on innovation, collaboration, and trust.
~Written By Noah Carter based on personal experience.
Reach me:
Telegram: @noahao
Email: noah@chainwire.online -
A Warning to Resellers: The Dark Side of Chainwire.org’s CEO
When entering a partnership with a press release distribution service, trust and professionalism should be the foundation of the relationship. However, my experience as a reseller with Chainwire.org revealed a troubling pattern of unethical behavior and manipulation—all originating from its CEO. This article serves as a cautionary tale for resellers and small competitors who might consider working with them.
The CEO’s Toxic and Unethical Business Tactics
Instead of focusing on improving Chainwire’s services and ensuring client satisfaction, the CEO is consumed by an obsession with controlling the industry and eliminating competitors—both big and small.
1. Hostility Towards Small Competitors
Rather than competing fairly by improving services, the CEO actively seeks to destroy smaller PR firms. He:
- Openly picks fights with smaller competitors, threatening them with legal action or false claims.
- Uses intimidation tactics, making it difficult for resellers to operate without fear of backlash.
- Badmouths competing PR firms, discouraging clients from working with them instead of focusing on improving Chainwire’s offerings.
This predatory approach is not only unethical but also dangerous for anyone considering a partnership with Chainwire.
2. Exploiting Resellers and Freezing Funds Without Justification
The CEO treats resellers as temporary tools, using them to generate business and then cutting them off when they are no longer needed.
🚨 Key Issues Faced by Resellers:
- Unfair Credit Handling: If you prepay for PR credits, there is a chance you may never see them credited to your account.
- Frozen Funds Without Justification: Payments made in advance are held without explanation, and resellers are left without access to their own money.
- Zero Transparency on Refunds: If a PR doesn’t get published due to their platform’s failure, you will struggle to get your money back.
I spoke to other agencies, and a couple of them agreed that they have faced a similar attitude towards them, which is quite risky for trusting the CEO of Chainwire.
3. The CEO Actively Instructs His Team to Ignore Complaints or Talk with Resellers
When resellers raise concerns via Telegram Group, the CEO takes extreme measures to silence them.
🔴 Examples of His Malicious Tactics:
- He warns his team NOT to respond to resellers’ complaints, leaving them without support.
- Emails and support tickets are ignored, forcing resellers into a dead-end with no resolution.
- He selectively chooses who gets assistance, showing clear favoritism and bias.
Instead of building a trustworthy and professional business, the CEO encourages a culture of secrecy and unethical conduct.
🚨 How to Protect Yourself as a Reseller 🚨
If you are considering working with Chainwire, take extreme caution before engaging with their services. Here’s how to protect yourself:
❌ Avoid Making Upfront Payments – Never pay in huge advance, as your funds may be held without a valid reason. Instead pay-per-use model.
❌ Avoid Trusting Their Credit Deposits – If you are a Reseller you may have missing credits, and there is no guarantee you will receive what you paid for.
❌ Do Not Rely on Their Customer Support – If anything goes wrong, expect no response from their team as the CEO restricts.
❌ Always Document Conversations – Keep written proof of agreements to safeguard yourself against false claims.
A Message to Chainwire Employees
Discouraging for employees of Chainwire.org, who may be aware/unaware of the unethical decisions made at the leadership level. I apologize for this write-up about their company—they excel at their work—but I need my money back, and I will do everything necessary to get it now.
However, this review is solely intended to highlight the experiences of resellers who had their funds frozen by an unprofessional and dishonest CEO.
If you are a potential reseller, think twice before working with Chainwire.ORG. There are better, more ethical PR distribution companies out there that will value your business and respect your partnership.
🔴 Resellers deserve transparency, professionalism, and respect. Don’t let an unethical CEO take advantage of your hard-earned money.
The credits that were promised to remain valid simply expired without any contender response from the team. For potential users considering their services, I would recommend thoroughly researching alternatives first to avoid the frustration I faced. Customer trust is vital, and sadly, my recent encounters left me feeling let down by their support and transparency.~Written By Noah Carter based on personal experience.
Reach me:
Telegram: @noahao
Email: noah@chainwire.online